You’re doing your own research because you have to. We built this wiki so you can trust what you find.
Every dose, side effect, and protocol is traceable to a clinical study or a counted community report. Not a blog post from a guy at the gym.
◇
PubMed first.
We start where the science starts. Human trials outrank animal studies, which outrank lab work. Our evidence tiers follow the best available human data, not the volume of rodent papers.
◇
We count what the community reports.
When we talk about side effects or anecdotal results, the numbers come from moderated forums and our own surveys. We count the reports. We don’t quote opinions.
◇
Suppliers are not a source. Ever.
We do not use supplier copy, marketing materials, or their lab reports to inform any protocol. Their job is to sell. Our job is to verify.
Two people review every page. One of them has direct experience with the peptide being discussed.
◇
Every number is traceable.
If a dose can’t be traced back to a specific study or a clear set of community data, we remove it. No exceptions.
◇
Dates are non-negotiable.
Every profile has a ‘last updated’ stamp. Anything older than 12 months gets flagged for a full re-review. The science changes. So do we.
A tier describes the state of the research. It does not tell you if a peptide will work for you. It tells you how much is known and how much is still a guess.
◇
Tier 3 · Strong.
There are multiple human trials, a regulatory approval, or a large-scale study behind the main claim. This is as close to a sure thing as it gets in this space.
◇
Tier 2 · Emerging.
Human data exists, but it might be from a small study, have mixed results, or be in early phases. Promising, but not proven.
◇
Tier 1 · Early.
Evidence is limited to animal or cell studies. Any human doses are extrapolations, not from direct testing. This is the frontier.
These are the things we refuse to do, no matter how many times we’re asked.
◇
No dosing for minors or pregnancy.
Not now, not ever. Those questions are for a clinician, period.
◇
No supplier recommendations.
We teach you how to audit a source. We will not name one. Your safety depends on your own diligence, not our endorsement.
◇
No theoretical stacking advice.
If we can’t find evidence of a peptide stack in clinical literature or significant community reporting, we don’t write about it. We report what is done, not what could be done.
Looking for a specific peptide?
Every profile has its own sources, reported side effects, and dosing data.
Community reference, not medical advice. Nothing here is approved for human use unless noted. Talk to a healthcare professional before starting any protocol. vialprep sells injection supplies, not compounds.
